Further hearing to take place in physician sexual misconduct case in Arlington Heights

In medicine, like most professions, sexual relationships with patients are prohibited.

In medicine, like most professions, sexual relationships with patients are prohibited.

Dr. Michael R. Kinney, a 28-year licensed and practicing physician and surgeon risks the indefinite loss of his license to practice in a case involving accusations of inappropriate sexual relations with a patient. From 2007 to 2008, a suburban single mother of three was treated for breast cancer with Dr. Kinney. During the period of treatment, the patient alleges her doctor’s advances started with a kiss and she knew exactly what he wanted. In proceedings before the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Responsibility (“IDFPR”), the prosecutor, Vladimir Lozovskiy seeks the indefinite suspension of Dr. Kinney’s license to practice.[i]

In Illinois, the Medical Practice Act of 1987[ii] states in the section of the law regarding disciplinary action, that the Department (IDFPR) shall adopt rules setting forth standards in determining, “what constitutes immoral conduct in the commission of any act, including, but not limited to, commission of an act of sexual misconduct related to the licensee’s practice…[iii]

There Department rules prohibit sexual relations between physicians and their patients for several reasons. According to the chief medical coordinator for the IDFPR, Mr. Brian Zachariah, “Even what might appear to an outside observer as a consensual behavior between a doctor and a patient is truly not consensual…the patient is in…a vulnerable position.[iv]” Further explaining, Zachariah reported that the physician is the one with the responsibility to avoid a sexual relationship with a patient, and that such an event could cause conflict with the decision-making abilities of the physician.

IDFPR cases are prosecuted similar to those in Illinois criminal courts.

Dr. Kinney is currently, as of the date of this article, licensed to practice medicine and the IDFPR site indicates he has never previously been disciplined by the Department. The Department prosecutor must prove their case before the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”), in this case, Judge Mike Lyons. After three days of hearings, this case was continued for further hearing, resuming at a later date. The ALJ will have 60 days to make a recommendation as to the status of Dr. Kinney and his license to practice medicine. The next procedural step is an additional 60 day window of time for Medical Disciplinary Board to make its recommendation before a final ruling.

According to reports from the first three days of hearing, there are not any witnesses to physical or sexual abuse or contact other than the complaining witness who testified as to her accounts of the ongoing sexual relationship between her and Dr. Kinney. In a “he said, she said” case like this the credibility of the witnesses and circumstantial evidence will be weighed carefully before a decision is made. Because the potential discipline in this case could be the indefinite suspension of the doctor’s license, the process of investigating and proving these types of complaints is significant.

Michael V. Favia & Associates represent licensed professionals in IDFPR matters.

If you are interested in learning more about Michael V. Favia & Associates, serving Chicago and its suburban communities, please visit the Favia Law Firm website for resources and articles of interest. To contact the firm to speak to a lawyer about a healthcare-related concern, you may dial (773) 631-4580. For more information about the firm’s practice areas, you can also visit the firm’s Facebook and Twitter sites. Please “Like” and “Follow” respectively to keep in touch!

[i] Chicago Tribune, Doctor in sexual misconduct case testifies, by Tony Briscoe, Sept. 26, 2014.

[ii] Medical Practice Act of 1987, 225 ILCS 60/1 et seq.

[iii] Medical Practice Act of 1987, 225 ILCS 60/22(A)(46) (c)

[iv] See Chicago Tribune article (HNi)


3 thoughts on “Further hearing to take place in physician sexual misconduct case in Arlington Heights

  1. Carol ungaro

    I am a 3 time breast cancer survivor,having cancer in 2006. 2008, and 2011. Dr kinney is the best, kindest compassionate doctor I have had, he pulled me through all the emotional and physical effects of chemo and radiation. I trust him with my life!
    Carol ungaro

  2. Scott

    Not believing after 28 years this doctor suddenly develops into a sexual predator. No previous reports and to the contrary, a stellar reputation amongst the community and the industry. I feel sad for the womans medical condition but have no mercy on her for attempting to discredit and ruin another persons life. Must be a very disturbed person with medical conditions beyond breast cancer. I pray Gods will and justice for this physician and his family.

  3. Viola Weber-Schroeder

    I was treated by Dr. Kinney in 2011 for breast cancer and like to say he is the kindest doctor I ever met.He gave me all the emotional support needed because Breast Cancer is very emotional.I was his patient till 2014 even that we moved to central PA. in 2012 we traveled to see this great doctor that saved my life.I totally trust him and his professional expertise.
    Viola Weber-Schroeder Bellefonte,Pa.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s